blogger

21 Apr 2013

6:19 pm Posted by Bigfish69
sleeping dogsQuestion 1
May we work on Sundays and do any activity we want? Or, are Sundays sacred where working is to be avoided and our activities are limited to only certain things?
And, if we believe a Sunday is sacred, may we justify this by stating it as God's will?
Didn't God rest on the last, on the seventh day of creation? Hasn't he also asked his people do do likewise, take a day of rest from work every week (see the 10 commandments)?

But the bible also reads that ...

Jesus did many things which the people of the day considered 'work'. He healed. He picked corn.  Indeed Jesus even chastised people for their hypocrisy for they too would do things considered 'work' if they needed to (e.g. Luke 13:15).
But that is different to earning an income on Sundays. Is it? Yes, the examples Jesus was involved in were not about income earning. They were simply about doing stuff. But, just because income earning is not among the examples doesn't mean it is not on the avoid doing list.  Maybe.  But the point is, these examples reveal work is not directly connected to income. And thus earning an income on a Sunday cannot be put into a special category.

Question 2
What is work?  By definition work is exerting effort to produce or accomplish something.  So, is work what we physically do? Or can work also be something else?  For example, have you heard someone say they, for example, they are "making an effort to change their attitude" or "making arrangements to go on holidays"? Indeed they may say it in other ways, 'trying to' or indeed 'working at'. The point is the same ... effort is being given to achieve something.

Work.

So should we avoid trying to change our attitudes on Sundays? Is that even possible? Would trying to stop, itself, be a type of effort or work to achieve?  Are priests and ministers making an effort, working, to teach us Sunday morning?

Question 3
So, if avoiding work is impossible, let alone on Sundays, then surely we should minimise it? That is a good thought but whose list will be followed? And will they create boundaries between people?  What does God say about what worship is, about living harmoniously, about favouritism? (read Acts 10; Romans 2; Galatians 2; Colossians 3; Ephesians 6 and also ... James 2)

One more question:

If God chose to have a rest on the seventh day of creation, are we still in it, or did he go back to work?

  • Do we still live in God's day of rest?  Anyone who has a full time job and also rests on Sundays, works for at least 85% of the week (and this only accounts for income earning income). So, does God ask us to work while he is resting and for how long will this continue?
  • Has God returned to work? And if so are we to apply it to a 7 day weekly calendar or something different? If God's calendar is synchronised with our Sundays off, will he then heal or forgive on the Sunday? Yes? Then surely God is working on the very day we suggest is designated, by him, for rest. Are our requests therefore falling on deaf ears on that day, because he is resting? Should we even therefore bother about church attendance on Sundays? Indeed, why would people claim to be healed while at church on Sundays?

Conclusion
Either God asks us to live one way and he another, or he intends his actions and ours, though imperfect, to be the same. My suggestion is that if it is the first way, then we may continue living the way we are. However, if he indeed intends his and our actions to align then we must reassess how we approach Sundays, rest and his will.

3 Mar 2013

9:59 am Posted by Bigfish69
IdeaIf there is no longer male or female ... (Gal 3:24-29)... why are men and women separated into different capacities (e.g. ministry, leadership, mission, teaching, etc)

Let me put it another way.  The law was our guardian until Christ came; it protected us until we could be made right with God through faith.  And now that the way of faith has come, we no longer need the law as our guardian.  For you are all children of God through faith in Christ Jesus.And all who have been united with Christ in baptism have put on Christ, like putting on new clothes.  There is no longer Jew or Gentile, slave or free, male and female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus. And now that you belong to Christ, you are the true children of Abraham. You are his heirs, and God’s promise to Abraham belongs to you.

17 Feb 2013

4:50 pm Posted by Bigfish69
cgon452lWhat does it mean to mature to be like Christ?

When Biblical studies are made about maturing, they often focus on the individual.  Me.  You.

However, if Christ is and was one with the Father, then maturing to be like Christ means maturing in ways that are more than the individual.  Could this be something to do with relationships?

  • with the Father    (Mt 22:37)
  • with other people (Mt 22:39)

The entire law and all the demands of the prophets are based on these two commandments (Mt 22:40)

Therefore, for God's people to mature, we must also focus on how and why we love others and worship God.  Indeed this may mean we shift the purpose of maturing personal from being a goal in its own right to a mechanism to be able to better serve others.  For our sake.
4:13 pm Posted by Bigfish69 Posted in
ksmn1526lIs it really possible to change or is the way you are set?  In other words, is the reason you behave the way you do a result of some kind of "hard-wiring" or is it possible to change?  Indeed, does God design people to be a certain way? If he did, does this mean you are "programmed" to act in certain ways?

And yet the Bible states Jesus came so we could be set free of our sins and therefore choose to live in ways that God asks of us.

Consequently, if we are unable to change the promise of Jesus is an impossibility!  Why?  Because we all do things which keep our relationship with God broken.In addition, if we cannot change, where does that leave free-will and choice?Could it even be that God designed us to be able to change?

Could it be that people who claim we are designed to act in certain ways are unwilling to accept personal responsibility for their own actions? "I can't help it!  This is just how I am." "If other people would't treat me this way I would not respond they way I do."

Wait a moment ... This line of thinking implies others need to change their actions so I may remain the same.  But this was said by the same person who claism change is not possible, we are just cimply doing what our biological or God-made programming causes us to do.

This is a contradiction at best, shifting responsibility.

If people cannot change, we cannot blame them for their actions and must either ignore it, forgive it, or let it go.

But if they can change then so can I.  And as a result I must show them the same grace as I would hope they would show me.  Not only that.  Maybe.  Just maybe, I need to accept my actions for what they are and examine how to change them where needed.

bookmark kingfisher

Facebook Favorites More Twitter

subscribe

Search