blogger

18 Apr 2011

11:15 am Posted by Bigfish69 Posted in , ,
adapted from a reflection by Brian Medway & Graeme Hush

introduction
Over the past twelve years of the Grace Canberra (Grace Christian Fellowship) congregation we have had opportunity to review a number of aspects of structure and ministry.  Since we separated from our previous denominational structure we have thought, prayed and studied in order to try and link Biblical revelation to contemporary circumstances.  The objective is to follow Jesus and fulfill his purpose.  At this juncture we have the opportunity of reviewing some aspects of pastoral leadership and pastoral ministry.

general new testament references to 'pastor' (poimen)
  • The relationship between Jesus and the people to whom he ministered in is likened to that of a shepherd and his sheep (Mt 9:36).
  • The relationship between Jesus and the disciples is described by the prophets as that between a shepherd and his sheep (Mt 26:31).
  • The relationship between Jesus and all people is likened to that of a shepherd and his sheep (Jn 10:11; Heb 13:20; 1Pe 2:25).
  • Identified as one of the five equipping ministries for the church (Eph 4:11).
  • Elders are charged with the challenge to combine their governmental role as willing caring servants of God’s purposes for the people rather than from a motive of greed or status (1Pe 1-4).

the idea of pastoral ministry as contrasted to the other defined ministry functions in the church
Despite the claims of some theological streams, the New Testament does not provide a definitive system for church leadership.  What it does talk about are a variety of leadership and ministry functions that are expressions of the fullness of Christ. The function of pastoral ministry is one of a number of ministry functions described in the New Testament.
If these functions example different aspects of that ministry it will help to see the function of pastor in the context of the other functions.  Our challenge will be to see that all the functions are represented so that Jesus might be the more fully known through our corporate lifestyle.

pastoral ministry
The Bible talks about the ministry function of a pastor (Ephesians 4) as an equipping ministry function in the church, in connection to four others.  Two (apostles and prophets) are described in other places as leadership functions, and three (teacher, pastor, evangelists) are ministry functions that may not infer leadership. Whether or not they should be seen as overall leadership functions doesn't cloud the the fact that they are equipping functions, represented by people who don't just DO the ministry but who EQUIP OTHERS to do the ministry.

[table id=2/]
pastoral ministry as an integral part of the mission of the church
rather than...
[table id=3/]
This ministry function needs to be effective because the overall task of the church is to become a kingdom force in the community. We don’t provide care to those people who want care. We need to get people well so they can go back to the front line free from physical, emotional or spiritual impediment.

The modeling of pastoral ministry by Jesus must be the first reference point for any attempt to profile the ministry itself

The primary reference point for this is the ministry of Jesus, which involved the modeling of pastoral care. It is therefore important to take reference points from there.

A direct reference to Jesus and his shepherd relationship with the disciples comes by way of a quote from the prophet Zechariah, “This very night you will all fall away on account of me, for it is written: “ ‘I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock will be scattered.’ (Matthew 26)

If Jesus was a model of pastoral leadership, who was his church?
Surely, first the twelve apostles and second, those who followed him. Yet, much of the care Jesus provided was to people who were not part of his “church.”

There is a lot of material showing the ministry of Jesus to his apostles. Not all of it represents pastoral leadership, but a significant amount constitutes the shepherd care he gave.
  • If we are going to get anything at all out of this attempt to put forward clear Biblical references to the work of pastors we must see it in its real context. And, the context for his pastoral ministry was his mission.
  • Jesus didn’t have an office to meet people in. He didn’t have a church building where people showed up for regular programs and activities. There is nothing to say that any of these are wrong in themselves, but we must be careful of making presumptions about them.
  • Jesus was indiscriminate about who he connected with, ranging from all kinds of community spheres. Wheres today, we often define the ministry by the perimeters of the church. The ministry of Jesus was missional and without walls. Any ministry to the “members” occurred along the missional journey (e.g. he took his disciples aside, spoke to them after speaking to everyone else, healed a member of Peter’s family just before the crowds came to the back door, etc).

We have created an industry that offers ministry exclusively to the church and not the community. And there always seems to be an endless and often repetitive supply of clientele.

the shepherd model
To put some balance into the equation we need to make the following observations about the shepherd model for the function of pastors (Ephesians 4). The best known is based on the character of God described in Psalm 23:
  • meeting people’s needs
  • training in righteous living
  • providing strength in times of difficulty
  • bringing celebration in the context of the battle
  • bringing the presence of goodness and love
  • keeping people in the covenant environment

judgement on neglectful shepherds in judah
The other great Old Testament image is found in Ezekiel 34 when the Lord chastises the priests for failing in their duty of care for the people.  From that passage we notice the following.

[table id=4/]
the shepherd care of Jesus (John 10)

[table id=5/]

pastoral ministry in the context of building church where you are
Our overall vision (Grace Canberra) is to serve the goal of seeing God's kingdom established in our region sphere by sphere using the strategy of training, commissioning, and supporting missionaries and planting churches in community spheres.

We are on a journey with coordinates that seek to follow after a ministry goal shaped by the unfulfilled desires of God revealed in Scripture.  As such we must continue to model what we do on the ministry of Jesus and the principles of God's word.
One of the issues we have to address is the will to set aside a model for doing church that has failed to effectively represent neither the heart nor the mission of Jesus Christ (see figure below). That is to stop making church the centre but rather the start.

institutional abuse of the pastoral function
The term, pastor was re-introduced to the church following the Reformation (link).  It was a term Luther, Zwingli, Calvin and other Reformation leaders used to contrast the Catholic term, 'priest.”'.  They wanted to move as far away from the idea of someone other than Jesus being a mediator between God and people.  Salvation was by faith alone and needed no intermediary.
As a result the term 'pastor':
  • Is synonymous with congregational leadership in evangelical and charismatic churches.
  • Is applied regardless of the style of leadership and particular leadership function a individual may fulfill.
  • Has gained various associated functions (e.g. senior pastor, worship pastor, youth pastor etc), with the shared idea being that a person with one or other of these titles is the leader of a department of the church.
We need to be responsible to recognise the gifts and anointing within people and then commission them and support them.  Even though 'pastor' is the term recognized widely in our community for leaders of evangelical churches and even though it is usually associated with formal recognition, we all know the church of Jesus Christ needs to see all of the functions working, and working together for the work to be accomplished.

summary of healthy assumptions
  • Pastoral care reflects the commitment to making people whole
  • Pastoral care must continue to be exercised in the church by the church to the church and community as an expression of God's heart to redeem, renew, and empower people for ministry.
  • Wholeness cannot be considered separate from the missionary call of Christ:  so our pastoral care ministry should empower people to become better missionaries.
  • Pastoral care happens best in the context of the work of the mission by fellow missionaries
  • The pastoral ministry is primarily an equipping ministry function in the church so that the whole church can become more able to provide pastoral care as and when it is needed.  It is not a separate department of the church that does the work on behalf of the rest of the church.
  • Pastoral leadership must transition from being a substitutionary function to a training and empowering one.

suggestions
  • Identify the various skills and anointings associated with pastoral ministry
  • Identify the people who represent those skills
  • Develop and implement a plan to release the people with the skills and anointing to equip as many people as possible in the church beginning with those who have formal or informal leadership responsibilities
  • Designate the people who have equipping skills as pastors
  • As part of the equipping process, we delegate as much pastoral care to the missionary activity in community spheres
  • Resist as much as possible the pressure to provide centralised substitutionary pastoral ministry.
  • Provide incidental crisis pastoral care from among designated pastoral people according to geographical or community sphere location.
  • Implement a plan to inform and encourage the church to understand our pastoral goals and seek to develop expectations that support them
Read Ephesians 4
  • Christ gave the church apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers.
  • Why?
    › To equip God’s people so they can to do his work and build up the church.
  • Why?
    › Because as each does their own special work, it helps others grow, enabling the whole church to be healthy, grow, and full of love.
  • How long will this continue?
    › Until we all come to unity in our faith and knowledge of God’s Son. That is, we are mature, full and complete like Christ.
    › We are no longer influenced by false teachings that sound like the truth. Instead we will speak the truth in love, growing more like Christ.
It is sometimes suggested that God gives people, specifically christians, spiritual gifts. Examples of these are found in the New Testament, with Ephesians 4 (above), Romans 12, and 1 Corinthians 12 being the main ones. This list is probably not an exhaustive one. Please note that each of these three all are introduced by a description of the unity and diversity in the body of Christ.

who are God's gifts for?
A quick definition is that the gifts God gives enable his people to do the things he needs to happen.
  • Does this mean they are spiritual or practical gifts?
  • Does God only give them to church people or anyone who follows Jesus Christ?
  • Are they for the benefit of the person who is given the gift or for someone else?
The purpose of this message is to explore the third question: are the gifts God gives for the person he gives them to or for others.
People who suggest God's gifts, spiritual or otherwise, and whoever they are given to, are for the benefit of the receiver tend to justify this by claiming that having a gift:
  • Gives you purpose; gives you a reason to get out of bed in the morning
  • Helps you in personal ways (worship, understand people, heal, etc)
  • Enables you to feel special or even loved
  • Helps improve you intellectually and/or morally
  • Proves you are 'saved' or 'filled by God's spirit'
  • Helps increase your power and influence or helps draw attention to your importance

What is common between the following passages of the bible (1Co12:7; Eph 4:12; 1Pe 4:10)? Do they recommend seeking gifts from God to benefit yourself or others?

conclusion
So are any of these reasons valid? Yes, all except the last wherein attention needs to be directed to God as they are his gifts, his power, his influence. And yet the yes is a qualified yes. A trumpet does not own the breath given it anymore than we do what is given us. The air does not belong to the trumpet. The gift is not yours. Nor is the input of the air what was intended, rather the sound out the other end. The music.

Moreover, if the music cannot be heard, no matter how gifted the musician, what was the point? So could be said of God's gifts. He invests them in you so others can be affected. And in the case of Ephesians 4, he enables some to equip others, who may then affect even more.

 The question then is who are these other people?

bookmark kingfisher

Facebook Favorites More Twitter

subscribe

Search