4:13 pm
Posted by Bigfish69
Posted in edit
Is
it really possible to change or is the way you are set? In other
words, is the reason you behave the way you do a result of some kind of
"hard-wiring" or is it possible to change? Indeed, does God design
people to be a certain way? If he did, does this mean you are
"programmed" to act in certain ways?
And yet the Bible states
Jesus came so we could be set free of our sins and therefore choose to
live in ways that God asks of us.
Consequently, if we are unable
to change the promise of Jesus is an impossibility! Why? Because we
all do things which keep our relationship with God broken.In addition,
if we cannot change, where does that leave free-will and choice?Could it
even be that God designed us to be able to change?
Could it be
that people who claim we are designed to act in certain ways are
unwilling to accept personal responsibility for their own actions? "I
can't help it! This is just how I am." "If other people would't treat
me this way I would not respond they way I do."
Wait a moment ...
This line of thinking implies others need to change their actions so I
may remain the same. But this was said by the same person who claism
change is not possible, we are just cimply doing what our biological or
God-made programming causes us to do.
This is a contradiction at best, shifting responsibility.
If people cannot change, we cannot blame them for their actions and must either ignore it, forgive it, or let it go.
But
if they can change then so can I. And as a result I must show them the
same grace as I would hope they would show me. Not only that. Maybe.
Just maybe, I need to accept my actions for what they are and examine
how to change them where needed.
10:30 am
Posted by Bigfish69
Posted in 4walls, action, belonging, body of christ, church, church health, churchianity, contemplations, fellowship, god's people, together, worship
Am reading the NT and re-encountered the part about eating foods offered to idols ...
- Knowledge leads to self-importance whereas love strengthens the church
- That not all believers know that there is one Father and one Jesus and therefore they continue to think that idols are real
- As
such they, for example, will see certain foods that were associated
with these idols (before becoming believers) as still attached to their
worship
- Thus if they see anyone eating these foods it will
create confusion: "How can you eat that, you are a believer, and now you
are worshiping this false god"
- This confusion may then lead the
new believer to eat the food they believe is wrong and therefore cause
them to break their own conscience
So Paul says, it is better to forever more not eat that food rather than cause that confusion in them
NOW ... my musing is how this relates to today ... specifically:
- That
not all believers know that since Jesus' death and resurrection there
is no need to go to the mountain altars or city temples to worship
because as he resides in us and we in him, we are free to worship
anywhere anytime in truth and spirit.
- Indeed many believers continue to believe that attending a specific building is the only place, or brings validity to worship
- Hence,
if they become aware that you are not attending a building or belong to
a specific group it will create confusion: "How can you worship that
way?" "If you are a believer, how can you claim authority or
protection?" etc.
- For these believers, the confusion they feel
could result in feeling they are being asked to do something they
believe is wrong and therefore cause them to break their own conscience
if they left their regular place of worship
The point I end my musings (at least in writing) is that I do not how to reconcile the final part ... suggestions please
So Paul says, it is better to forever more not eat that food rather than cause that confusion in them...
There
are many theories and ideas about how and when the world will end.
Will it be an environmental cataclysm, world war 3, the eventual
destruction of the sun, even alien invasion.
For some people who
profess Jesus as real these theories include his return and associated
with the various apocalyptic visions of the bible's book of Revelation,
among others. The nation of Israel is also normally included into the
theory. Will people who believe in Jesus be taken to heaven before the
disasters? Or not.
People have been trying to predict the end of
our world for generations, and for followers of Christ, since his death
and resurrection. Even before.
How? Some read the scriptures and
present a series of literal events. Others may then take these
passages and interpret them through what they see happening around them
or expect to happen. Others look at world events and seek biblical
passages to 'match them'.
It is natural for us to see patterns in
our world. Doing so helps us make sense of an otherwise confusing and
sometimes overwhelming life. It is often difficult not to.
But
is it wise? Is it wise to see the world, see other people, indeed live
our lives this way? How does living like this cause us to treat people?
Indeed ...
Why are we told that we will not know when Jesus will
return (Mat 24)? To be ready all the time, for the Son of Man will come
when least expected.
Should we be eager for the end?
What was Jesus' focus?
9:45 am
Posted by Bigfish69
Posted in 4walls, authentic, belonging, dysfunction, equipping, family, god's people, kingdom, oneness, revelation, tribal
Please first read Colossians 1
Are
all people made holy through Christ? Is he reconciling all creation to
Him? If so, then how are we to understand Ephesians 4?
Apostles. Prophets. Evangelists. Teachers. Pastors. These are the five roles given for the equipping of the saints. But pause for a moment ... are these words accurate translations?
Saints ... This is an English word used to translate the Greek word meaning sacred or holy.
It is the same word always used to refer to the Holy Spirit and Holy
Scriptures. As such, it is not surprising to see it in terms of God's
holy people or saints. But is that what has occurred here? Does the next part of the passage which refers to doing the work of the ministry only refer to believers?
Equipping ... To provide whatever is needed to make something perfect, mature, full.
Consider
for a moment (John 14-15, Rom 2, Heb 8-10, Col 1) ... According to
Jesus, truth and spirit influences everything and everywhere, whether or
not it recognises it as doing so. Therefore, what would happen if
this understanding were placed into the Ephesians passage?
The
five roles were provided by God so everyone (and everything) God
considers holy could be made perfect, mature, full in every way.
This
is significant because it suggests that apostles, prophets,
evangelists, teachers, and pastors were not sent for Christians.
Rather, they were sent for all creation, every part of it, including
everyone regardless of their faith, experience of God, or
acknowledgement of Him.
Could it be God is prepared to interact
directly with people? Could it be that people are not obligated to go
to designated Christian places and spaces? Could it be that we are to
go to them?